BERWICK STAR NEWS
Home » Nuke reaction

Nuke reaction

By Melissa Meehan
CASEY residents have lodged a response to the City of Casey’s Nuclear Report, urging the mayor Colin Butler and councillors to make the municipality nuclear free.
Organised by Westernport Action Group president Mary Madigan, the submission contained information about the lasting effects that any nuclear reactor or materials passing through the city would cause.
The submission includes 12 reasons why Ms Madigan and the Westernport Action Group believe that Casey should remain nuclear free.
Their submission is in response to the September council report which recommended against a nuclear reactor in Casey.
Ms Madigan said many unhappy residents have contacted her since councillor Rob Wilson asked the council to test whether the municipality was suitable for nuclear power.
“The council asked the community for feedback and we think that this submission makes it absolutely clear that Casey residents are opposed to nuclear power of any kind being brought to the area,” Ms Madigan said.
“The residents and ratepayers of the city of Casey do not want a nuclear reactor in the municipality nor do they want nuclear materials transported through the city,” Ms Madigan said.
Ms Madigan said that making Casey nuclear free was an important issue because even if a nuclear power plant was not built in the municipality, transporting nuclear material by road or rail from another area through Casey could also have a detrimental effect on local residents.
“Hypothetically one or two pounds of plutonium evenly distributed throughout the world could kill most people on Earth with lung cancer.
“We don’t want to increase the chances of people getting sick,” Ms Madigan said.
“We request that the City of Casey is proclaimed a nuclear free zone and that the council vigorously oppose all aspects of the nuclear cycle for environmental, economic, political, moral and social reasons,” Ms Madigan said.
The Westernport Action Group believes that natural energy resources such as the sun and the wind are a much more feasible choice for Casey.
“I don’t understand why people have the idea that old technology such as nuclear power is a better choice than wind, water and solar power.
“Maybe because they are a free source and they want to charge us for it?” Ms Madigan said.
Greens candidate and secretary for the Westernport Action Group Lynette Keleher agreed that nuclear energy was not a feasible form of energy.
“Nuclear power is not the answer,” Ms Keleher said.
“Let’s move forward for our children’s sake and the future of this planet.”

Digital Editions


More News

  • Q&A with beekeeper Alice Lin

    Q&A with beekeeper Alice Lin

    Purchase this photo from Pic Store: 520714 What inspired you to start beekeeping, and how long have you been doing it? I’ve only been learning beekeeping for a few months.…

  • MotoGP to leave Phillip Island, last race this year

    MotoGP to leave Phillip Island, last race this year

    After almost three decades, there will no longer be a great procession of motorcycles and cars heading south every October, as the MotoGP will move from Phillip Island after this…

  • Cranbourne Golf Course housing plan approved amid housing pressure

    Cranbourne Golf Course housing plan approved amid housing pressure

    Purchase this photo from Pic Store: 392859 Casey councillors have unanimously approved a controversial planning permit to turn the northern half of the Cranbourne Golf Course into almost 500 homes,…

  • Clyde up for the challenge

    Clyde up for the challenge

    Purchase this photo from Pic Store: 533226 A red-hot Rutter Park battle saw the two most in-form teams of the competition in Tooradin and Clyde go back-and-forth on day one…

  • Tons galore in lower grades

    Tons galore in lower grades

    Purchase this photo from Pic Store: 533224 B GRADE Table-leaders Pakenham Upper/Toomuc have been set a monumental task by Tooradin after the Seagulls posted 267 in the first innings at…